Bauwens’ “partner state” (part 2 of 3) . . . vis à vis TIMN

[PLACE-HOLDER: This is a faux post. The text for this post — part 2 of a 3-part series on Bauwens’ partner-state concept — is not ready yet. I’m filing this notice as a post just to create a place-holder for it, so that, when ready, it appears in a correct sequence between parts 1 and 3.

Part 2 is going to focus on P2P’s tri-modal architecture, with sections on its views about the empowerment of civil society, the rise of the commons as a new (third) sector, and P2P as a new (third) mode of governance. When part 2 is done, I’ll insert it here and delete this place-holder.

Meanwhile, part 3 is done. Instead of continuing to let it sit, I'll post it tomorrow, in order to keep a semblance of momentum going here, despite my flagging ways these days.]

TO BE CONTINUED

FOR AN UPDATE ABOUT THIS POST AND ITS CONTENTS,
SEE MY MARCH 2014 POST HERE